{"id":3723,"date":"2026-11-03T12:28:34","date_gmt":"2026-11-03T11:28:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/?page_id=3723"},"modified":"2026-11-03T12:28:34","modified_gmt":"2026-11-03T11:28:34","slug":"the-rcf-foundational-reading-list","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/?page_id=3723","title":{"rendered":"The RCF Foundational Reading List"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

1. Understanding Systems and Limits<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thinking in Systems \u2014 Donella Meadows<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Meadows provides the foundational primer on systems thinking: how to identify stocks, flows, feedback loops, delays, and leverage points in complex systems. She argues that many policy failures stem from misunderstanding system structure (e.g., focusing on symptoms rather than causes, or intervening at the wrong leverage point). The book is both a technical guide and a philosophical meditation on humility in the face of complexity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF is a<\/em> systems framework<\/em><\/strong>. The four capitals (Natural, Built, Human, Social) are interacting stocks. Their flows (energy, materials, labour, knowledge) must be balanced. Degradation occurs when feedback loops are ignored (e.g., treating Nature as an infinite source\/sink). The RCF\u2019s focus on \u201cmaturity\u201d and \u201cequity\u201d is a direct application of Meadows\u2019 leverage point thinking: the most powerful intervention is to<\/em> redesign the rules of the system<\/em><\/strong> (Social Capital) rather than merely tweak flows.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

The Limits to Growth \u2014 Meadows, Randers, Behrens III (1972)<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> The seminal work of the Club of Rome. Using system dynamics modelling, the authors showed that if exponential growth in population, industrialisation, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continued on a finite planet, collapse would occur within the 21st century. The \u201cstandard run\u201d predicted overshoot and decline by the 2050s. The authors did not claim this was inevitable; they argued that deliberate policy could create a \u201cstabilised world\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF is, in essence, the<\/em> accounting framework<\/em><\/strong> for the Limits to Growth problem. The \u201climits\u201d are the carrying capacities of Natural Capital (atmosphere, ecosystems, minerals). The RCF translates these biophysical limits into an Assets-Liabilities-Equity (ALE) balance sheet. The \u201cmaturity\u201d concept is the RCF\u2019s answer to the question: \u201cWhat does a stabilised world look like?\u201d The RCF also inherits the Meadows team\u2019s normative commitment: collapse is not inevitable; deliberate transformation is possible.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change \u2014 William R. Catton Jr<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Catton expands on the Limits to Growth by introducing the concept of \u201covershoot\u201d\u2014when a population exceeds the carrying capacity of its environment, leading to a subsequent decline or crash. He distinguishes between \u201cdrawdown\u201d (using non-renewable resources) and \u201coverload\u201d (exceeding the environment\u2019s capacity to absorb waste). Catton argues that modern industrial civilisation is a \u201cphantom carrying capacity\u201d powered by fossil fuels, and that overshoot is not just an economic or technical problem but a profound ecological and psychological crisis<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF\u2019s entire<\/em> \u201cEnvironmental Insolvency\u201d<\/em><\/strong> concept is drawn directly from Catton\u2019s overshoot framework. When a firm (or a sector, or a nation) uses more Natural Capital than it can regenerate, it is in a state of \u201cdebt\u201d\u2014but this debt is not expressed in financial accounts. The RCF makes that ecological debt visible by placing it on the balance sheet as a<\/em> Liability<\/em><\/strong>. Catton\u2019s focus on the psychology of denial is also reflected in the RCF\u2019s insistence that policy must move beyond monetary valuation and confront biophysical reality.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Planetary Boundaries \u2014 Johan Rockstr\u00f6m and colleagues<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> A series of scientific papers (starting 2009, updated 2015, 2023) that define a \u201csafe operating space for humanity\u201d based on nine planetary boundaries: climate change, biosphere integrity, land-system change, freshwater use, biogeochemical flows (nitrogen and phosphorus), ocean acidification, atmospheric aerosol loading, stratospheric ozone depletion, and novel entities (chemicals). The research shows that several boundaries have already been transgressed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF provides the<\/em> accounting framework<\/em><\/strong> for Planetary Boundaries. The boundaries are the normative \u201cAssets\u201d (the safe operating space). The RCF\u2019s ALE tables translate these boundaries into national and corporate balance sheets: \u201cAsset\u201d is the boundary; \u201cLiability\u201d is the degree of transgression; \u201cEquity\u201d is the remaining safe space. The RCF also operationalises Planetary Boundaries by linking them to<\/em> material actors<\/em><\/strong> (who is responsible?) and<\/em> regeneration pathways<\/em><\/strong> (how to return to safe space).<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Ecological Maturity \u2014 Howard T. Odum<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Odum, a pioneer of systems ecology, developed a framework for assessing the maturity of ecosystems. Mature ecosystems are characterised by higher diversity, more complex nutrient cycling, greater biomass, and more efficient energy use. He identified 24 attributes of maturity (e.g., gross production\/respiration ratio approaches 1, nutrient conservation is high). Odum argued that human disturbance pushes ecosystems back to earlier, less mature (and less resilient) stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The concept of<\/em> \u201cmaturity\u201d<\/em><\/strong> in the RCF is directly inherited from Odum. The RCF defines mature Natural Capital as an ecosystem capable of providing services sustainably, and mature Built Capital as infrastructure that is sufficient, efficient, and non-degrading. Odum\u2019s ecological maturity metrics (detritus recycling, phosphorus leakage, etc.) provide the biophysical<\/em> indicators<\/em><\/strong> for measuring maturity. The RCF extends Odum\u2019s framework from ecosystems to all four capitals.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth \u2014 William E. Rees and Mathis Wackernagel<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> The authors introduce the Ecological Footprint concept: a measure of human demand on nature, expressed as the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to produce the resources a population consumes and to absorb its waste. They compare this to Earth\u2019s \u201cbiocapacity\u201d (the productive area available). The book shows that humanity\u2019s ecological footprint has exceeded global biocapacity since the 1970s\u2014a state of \u201cecological overshoot.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The Ecological Footprint is the<\/em> single most direct quantitative precursor<\/em><\/strong> to the RCF\u2019s ALE approach. The RCF generalises the footprint concept to all four capitals, not just Natural Capital. The RCF\u2019s \u201cEquity\u201d column is analogous to the remaining biocapacity; the \u201cLiability\u201d is the overshoot. The RCF also adds the crucial dimension of<\/em> material actors<\/em><\/strong>\u2014asking not just how much overshoot exists, but who is responsible (corporations, sectors, nations) and who is affected.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

2. Understanding Natural Capital<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Permaculture \u2014 David Holmgren and Bill Mollison<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Permaculture is a design system for creating sustainable human settlements by mimicking natural ecosystems. Core principles include: observe and interact; catch and store energy; produce no waste; use and value renewable resources; design from patterns to details; integrate rather than segregate; use small and slow solutions. It is both a practical toolkit (agroforestry, water harvesting, building design) and a philosophical approach to human-nature relations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Permaculture provides the<\/em> design principles<\/em><\/strong> for regenerating Natural Capital. The RCF is a decision-making framework; permaculture is a design framework. The RCF identifies that Natural Capital is degraded; permaculture offers methods to restore it (e.g., agroforestry, soil building, water cycling). The RCF also inherits permaculture\u2019s ethical foundation: \u201cCare for the Earth, Care for People, Fair Share.\u201d These are the moral underpinnings of the RCF\u2019s stewardship imperative.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Polly Higgins \/ Ecocide<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Polly Higgins was a Scottish barrister who campaigned to make \u201cecocide\u201d a crime under international law, equivalent to genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. She defined ecocide as \u201cthe extensive damage, destruction to or loss of ecosystems of a given territory, whether by human agency or by other causes, to such an extent that peaceful enjoyment by the inhabitants has been severely diminished.\u201d The campaign has gained momentum, with the EU adopting a directive on environmental crimes and international discussions at the UN.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF provides the<\/em> evidence base<\/em><\/strong> for ecocide. If a corporation\u2019s operations degrade Natural Capital to the point of insolvency, that is ecocide. The RCF\u2019s \u201cEnvironmental Insolvency\u201d concept gives a legal and economic language to what Higgins framed as a criminal act. The RCF also identifies the<\/em> material actors<\/em><\/strong> responsible\u2014making it possible to assign legal liability. The RCF thus provides the accounting framework that could underpin ecocide prosecutions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

3. Understanding Human and Social Capital<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Spirit Level \u2014 Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> A comprehensive study showing that more equal societies (in terms of income and wealth) perform better on nearly every social indicator: health, mental health, trust, violence, social mobility, educational outcomes, and even environmental performance. The authors argue that inequality creates stress and social status anxiety, which leads to a range of social pathologies. Equality is not just a moral good; it is a practical necessity<\/strong> for societal well-being.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF defines<\/em> Human Capital<\/em><\/strong> as health, knowledge, skills, and well-being. The Spirit Level shows that inequality degrades Human Capital for everyone\u2014not just the poor. The RCF\u2019s normative target of<\/em> income scale compression (1:5)<\/em><\/strong> is directly informed by this research. The RCF also recognises that inequality undermines<\/em> Social Capital<\/em><\/strong> (trust, cooperation, institutions), making it harder to manage commons and regenerate Natural Capital.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Governing the Commons \u2014 Elinor Ostrom<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Ostrom won the Nobel Prize for her work showing that common-pool resources (forests, fisheries, water, pastures) can be managed sustainably by user communities without needing either state ownership or private property. She identified eight design principles: clearly defined boundaries; congruence between rules and local conditions; collective-choice arrangements; monitoring; graduated sanctions; conflict-resolution mechanisms; recognition of rights to organise; and nested governance for larger commons. She showed that \u201cthe tragedy of the commons\u201d is not inevitable; it depends on institutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF\u2019s<\/em> Social Capital<\/em><\/strong> concept\u2014institutions, laws, organisations\u2014is the framework for Ostrom\u2019s design principles. The RCF\u2019s focus on<\/em> material actors<\/em><\/strong> (who is responsible for degradation and stewardship) reflects Ostrom\u2019s insistence on clearly defined boundaries and accountability. The RCF\u2019s \u201ccommon-pool resources\u201d analysis (e.g., atmosphere, oceans, minerals) draws directly on Ostrom. The RCF also inherits Ostrom\u2019s optimistic conclusion: with the right institutions, degradation can be reversed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

4. Understanding Sufficiency and Provisioning<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Logic of Sufficiency \u2014 Thomas Princen<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Princen argues that the dominant economic logic is one of \u201cefficiency\u201d (doing more with less) but that efficiency alone does not address the deeper problem of \u201csufficiency\u201d (having enough). He argues that sufficiency requires a fundamental shift in values and institutions: from maximisation to satiation, from growth to enoughness, from competition to cooperation. He uses case studies (e.g., fisheries, forestry, energy) to show that sufficiency is not about sacrifice but about redefining well-being<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF\u2019s<\/em> maturity<\/em><\/strong> concept is the accounting counterpart to sufficiency. A mature system is one that provides enough\u2014not more than enough, but enough. The RCF\u2019s focus on<\/em> provisioning<\/em><\/strong> (is each built capital category sufficient for basic needs?) is directly derived from Princen\u2019s logic. The RCF also uses the sufficiency framework to critique GDP growth: growth beyond sufficiency is not progress; it is overconsumption that degrades capitals.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Doughnut Economics \u2014 Kate Raworth<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Raworth proposes a visual framework for sustainable development: the \u201cdoughnut.\u201d The inner ring is the \u201csocial foundation\u201d (minimum standards of well-being\u2014food, water, health, education, housing). The outer ring is the \u201cecological ceiling\u201d (planetary boundaries). The goal is to live in the \u201cdoughnut\u201d between the two\u2014meeting everyone\u2019s needs without exceeding Earth\u2019s limits. She critiques neoclassical economics for ignoring both social and ecological realities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF is a<\/em> formal accounting framework<\/em><\/strong> for the doughnut. The doughnut\u2019s social foundation corresponds to the RCF\u2019s<\/em> Human Capital<\/em><\/strong> (provisioning sufficiency). The ecological ceiling corresponds to the RCF\u2019s<\/em> Natural Capital<\/em><\/strong> (planetary boundaries). The RCF adds the<\/em> Built and Social Capital<\/em><\/strong> dimensions that Raworth touches on but does not fully systematise. The RCF also provides the<\/em> ALE balance sheet<\/em><\/strong> that operationalises the doughnut at the level of firms, sectors, and nations.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

5. Understanding Management<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Quality Is Free \u2014 Philip Crosby<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Crosby argues that quality is not a cost; it is an investment. The cost of non-quality (defects, rework, customer complaints) is higher than the cost of prevention. He introduced the concept of \u201czero defects\u201d and the idea that quality should be managed proactively rather than inspected after the fact. His mantra: \u201cQuality is free; it\u2019s the non-quality that costs.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF applies Crosby\u2019s logic to<\/em> Natural Capital<\/em><\/strong>. The cost of environmental degradation (non-quality) is enormous\u2014but it is not accounted for. The RCF\u2019s ALE balance sheet makes these costs visible. \u201cEnvironmental Insolvency\u201d is the point at which the cost of non-quality (degradation) exceeds the value of the asset. The RCF thus extends Crosby\u2019s insight:<\/em> Sustainability is free; it\u2019s the unsustainability that costs.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Out of the Crisis \u2014 W. Edwards Deming<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Deming\u2019s classic work on management theory, based on his 14 points for transforming business effectiveness. He argues that most problems are systemic, not due to worker errors. He advocates for continuous improvement, reduction of variation, and long-term thinking over short-term profits. He rejects management by fear and emphasises the importance of education and training.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF\u2019s focus on<\/em> systemic change<\/em><\/strong> rather than blame is directly from Deming. The RCF does not blame individual workers for environmental degradation; it identifies the<\/em> pressuring capitals<\/em><\/strong> (most often built) that create the wrong incentives. The RCF\u2019s normative approach\u2014defining mature states and then managing toward them\u2014is a form of Deming\u2019s \u201ccontinuous improvement\u201d applied to socio-ecological systems. The RCF also inherits Deming\u2019s focus on<\/em> long-term thinking<\/em><\/strong>: we must manage capitals for future generations, not quarterly profits.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

The New Economics \u2014 W. Edwards Deming<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Deming\u2019s final book, extending his earlier work to a critique of the entire economic system. He argues that the prevailing economic model\u2014based on competition, short-term profit, and the primacy of the shareholder\u2014is destructive. He proposes a new economics based on cooperation, systemic thinking, and the well-being of all stakeholders (customers, workers, suppliers, community, and the environment). He calls for a \u201ctransformation\u201d rather than incremental change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF is, in many ways, the<\/em> accounting system for Deming\u2019s new economics<\/em><\/strong>. The four capitals are the stakeholders Deming cared about. The RCF\u2019s focus on<\/em> equity<\/em><\/strong> (not just profit) reflects his critique of shareholder primacy. The RCF\u2019s \u201cmaturity\u201d concept is the goal of Deming\u2019s transformation: a system that provides well-being for all while regenerating its own foundations.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Physical Asset Management \u2014 Nicholas Anthony John Hastings<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> A practical guide to managing physical assets (infrastructure, machinery, buildings) over their lifecycle. Hastings covers acquisition, operation, maintenance, renewal, and disposal. He emphasizes the importance of whole-life costing, risk management, and sustainability. The book is grounded in engineering and financial management but also addresses environmental and social responsibilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF\u2019s<\/em> Built Capital<\/em><\/strong> analysis draws directly on Hastings. The RCF extends his asset management framework to<\/em> all four capitals<\/em><\/strong>. The RCF\u2019s ALE tables are a form of whole-life accounting\u2014not just for physical assets but for Natural, Human, and Social Capital too. The RCF also inherits Hastings\u2019 focus on<\/em> stewardship<\/em><\/strong>: assets must be managed not just for current owners but for future generations.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Appreciative Inquiry \u2014 David Cooperrider<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Cooperrider developed an approach to organisational change that focuses on strengths rather than deficits. Instead of asking \u201cwhat\u2019s wrong?\u201d and trying to fix problems, Appreciative Inquiry asks \u201cwhat\u2019s working?\u201d and amplifies strengths. The process involves: Discover (what gives life?), Dream (what might be?), Design (what should be?), and Destiny (how to create it?). It has been used in corporations, communities, and international development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF\u2019s<\/em> normative, forward-looking approach<\/em><\/strong> is appreciative. The RCF does not only diagnose degradation; it defines a positive vision of mature capitals and pathways to reach them. The RCF\u2019s \u201cmaturity\u201d concept is a form of \u201cDream\u201d and \u201cDesign.\u201d The RCF\u2019s focus on<\/em> regeneration<\/em><\/strong> rather than merely reducing harm reflects Cooperrider\u2019s insight: sustainable change comes from building on strengths, not just avoiding weaknesses.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

6. Understanding the Financial Economy<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The New Economics \u2014 Steve Keen<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pr\u00e9cis:<\/strong> Keen, a heterodox economist, critiques neoclassical economics for its unrealistic assumptions (rational actors, equilibrium, efficient markets). He argues that economics must be grounded in ecological and biophysical realities. He proposes a new economics based on complexity, disequilibrium, and the recognition that the economy is a subsystem of the biosphere. He emphasises the role of debt, money creation, and financial instability, and argues that mainstream economics has failed to predict or prevent crises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to RCF:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The RCF answers Keen\u2019s core question:<\/em> \u201cWhat is the relationship between financial claims and the real productive and ecological economy?\u201d<\/em><\/strong> The RCF shows that financial capital is a<\/em> claim on real capital<\/em><\/strong> (Natural, Built, Human, Social). When financial claims exceed real capital value, insolvency occurs. The RCF\u2019s \u201cEnvironmental Insolvency\u201d is the point at which financial assets are backed by nothing but degraded real capital. The RCF is, in this sense, an<\/em> ecological accounting system<\/em><\/strong> that reveals the underlying reality that financial accounts obscure.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

1. Understanding Systems and Limits Thinking in Systems \u2014 Donella Meadows Pr\u00e9cis: Meadows provides the foundational primer on systems thinking: how to identify stocks, flows, feedback loops, delays, and leverage points in complex systems. She argues that many policy failures stem from misunderstanding system structure (e.g., focusing on symptoms rather than causes, or intervening at […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_jetpack_hide_featured_image":false,"_jetpack_featured_image_duplicate_dismissed":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3723","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3723"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3723\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3724,"href":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3723\/revisions\/3724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/avbp.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}