Jane from out network posts this report on her first few months with 10,000 steps a day. Hope it inspires you too!
Experiences from starting a 10,000 step a day routine.
Yep, its true walking more does make me feel good. It has very low “barriers to entry” for getting into good exercise habits.
I have encountered a few issues, 10,000 steps takes quite a lot of time, which needs to be planned into my day. Leaving kids at school and walking 2 metro stops makes 6,000 steps before ! Then lunch time I need to either have an exercise session or find a lunch restaurant a bit further away than the handiest one. I have sometimes had to prioritize exercise over eating and then eat at my desk.
I bought 2 pedometers and gave one to my partner; in the beginning we sent an SMS to each other when we had made 10,000; I find the competitive element fun. Some days I have forgotten my pedometer and I have to use my own judgement to approximate. To help I have made a simple spreadsheet where I put in the number of steps (about 20 days out of 30 per month; no-one is perfect!) and then I can take an average more easily. I have also found and adapted a conversion table so that I can include other activities such as swimming and aerobics in my step counting.
As I am already relatively fit and my weight has remained stable. The benefits for me are that I sleep better which has led to more energy and better mental balance during the day. I really recommend walking and aiming for 10,000 steps a day as part of a healthy lifestyle.
I would like to loose about 4 kilos (half a stone) so for the next 3 months I am going to increase the amount of “other” exercise I do and aim for at least 10,000 steps every day. More on my progress in the future.
Suppose there were a place – let’s call it PORENA – where people enjoyed a good standard of living and well-being whilst living within the the limits of nature … that is to say avoiding environmental depletion. Let’s say I go visit and then file a report of what I found out.
OK here comes the report.
In my quest to find out how a standard of living could be produced for all sustainably, that is efficiently and with minimum impact on the environment and health, I visited PORENA again. The country of PORENA abolished work as we know it some time ago after they realized paid work was actually fueling the development of a non-sustainable society. The whole system was threatening the environment, people’s health and creating a society that was not pleasant to live in. Many people were actually “out of work” which was draining resources.
On the one hand setting up strict rules for emissions of all kinds into the environment on the other they made housing, education, food etc free. They also focused on producing a standard of living for all cheaply, environmentally and in a socially sound way. Removing the stress on the individual – meeting physiological needs – is at the heart of the PORENA way. How they managed this is still unclear to me, but to make a start I was invited to meet the management of the city of PORENA for an Interview.
Hustled into a meeting room I was introduced to Aaron Heathcliffe and his team. Aaron is in his late 50’s bearded, wearing a dark grey suit. He introduces me to the management team, who all work through a series of networks, I am given to understand.
Everyone here is a volunteer on this a management team that looks after the overall running of affairs in the city. “None of us have to do this; we do it because we love it! We feel it is important, that we are OK at it and we want to do it,” says Heathcliffe.
Accommodation is produced on a voluntary basis as well. Those who are on the housing production and maintenance network design build houses as they are needed.
“Remember, a house built to be energy efficient and built to last is highly cost effective. We use local techniques, local materials and design to suit local needs; – there is nothing radical about that.”
Heathcliffe also means that there are no secrets to clothing production either: “Clothing is the same as for shelter- local material, local fashions, local production – you make do with what you have locally.”
The people of the city grow food everywhere. When they were looking into banishing paid work many had said “I have to go to work to put food on the table for my family”. So they decided to remove this particular stress by building greenhouse extensions to living accommodation and grow food in public places.
Says Heathcliffe; “You have to grow food everywhere. Transportation costs are kept to a minimum.Another benefit of growing close to use is that you harvest just what you need and it keeps longer and waste is at a minimum.”
One real revolution can perhaps be seen in PORENA’s social system. Often described as “the just go along place,” removing paid jobs means anyone can go along and help out to their own abilities and interests. One factor, again related to removing stress, is that people need to feel a part of society. Obviously, when there are things to be done people like to pitch in together and help.
Another factor was that of health. By limiting the functions powered by fossil fuels to the ones that either saved lives or replaced damagingly heavy, monotonous or dangerous work, a lot of activities required muscle power. These provide an opportunity for useful, social exercise and promote health.
Says Heathcliffe: “your network marketing is good as it does not exclude everyone. That is really important for the way human beings function. This has been known throughout time, that inclusion is a powerful part of society, yet you use it and develop it far too little.”
Heathcliffe defends the PORENA model as being extremely efficient: “It is so easy to do anything we want- we have endless numbers of people available. Say we wanted to build another canal – we could do it tomorrow. Just put the word out we want to build a canal people would say `that’s cool´ `when can we come? ´ You would have volunteers for everything from planning, designing, engineering and those who did the planning would be well into pitching into the physical digging as well.”
He often asks people to think about the kind of society they would like to live in:” Do you want a society that has to write complicated contracts, that says `we can only afford this number of people you can’t help out we don’t have the money to employ you we’ll do it on the cheap´. No –one wants to live in a society like that. Everyone wants to live in a society that says “We need a canal” and everyone goes “OK! We’re in” and then “Fine! What can you do? Where do you want to help out?”
They also take great pains to ensure the city is a great place to live in from other aspects. Very aware that the society I come from is addicted to short-term hits of happiness they are quick to point out that PORENA functions in more of natural rhythm. Says one of Heathcliffe’s managers; “Do you understand why we like this place? Life here is so cool!.” We have such a good time.We are pointing out that the city breathes -awakens, projects happen, sleeps -depending on the time of year in a yearly cycle. As food is grown everywhere people are close to natural rhythms. People know when to sign up for activities as they come every year,”
Focus in PORENA is also on health, although I got some funny looks when I asked about health care.
I get the explanation that they treat health more like a veterinarian would. People who work with health – it is their job to keep healthy people healthy.
That means infrastructure, nutrition, shelter, security not getting hurt and people not getting sick rather than actually “caring”. Health promotion and maintenance is what they work with. And I understand that this is a big part of standard of life production. It is far cheaper and easier to keep healthy people healthy than to treat sick people.
A set of people work with health in a network. You can have a health check anytime you like. And there are clinics available for all kinds of treatments.
The whole fabric of society is intended to be heath promoting: people walk everywhere and use people power wherever feasible for tasks like digging and working on the fields and marshes and harvesting. That is physical work that is not too strenuous and it is muscle building and heath promoting. And if you do not feel like doing it you do not have to. It is good to strain the muscles as a complement to walking. Muscles need to be challenged by pushing and pulling things. But it has to be done right. People need to learn how to do that.
And for carrying and transporting goods there is an array of carts to do the jobs.
My conclusions: by starting simply from local conditions you can create a standard of living for all by:
Removing stress from people – providing basic shelter, food and inclusion
Including everyone in the production process.
Limiting the need for fossil fuel to dangerous or life-saving tasks.
Focusing on health promotion
Following the natural rhythm of the day, season and year
Removing money and all the costs associated with its handling
What can we take away from this meeting?
Is this feasible for our world? One thing quick research turns up is the lack of an agreed, sustainability oriented definition of standard of living. It may be that climatic and other conditions make it difficult to find a global comparison, although here again the UN have made a good start. One simple measure that could be done right away is for each country to define what it means by a basic standard of living. They could then measure what percentage of the population was living at it, what it was costing, its environmental impact etc.
But perhaps what is on many people’s minds as they read about PORENA is how did they manage to get everyone on board? How did they get the whole society pulling in the same direction, and learned to let everyone into the various tasks and functions needed to run the place? That is a subject for later visits.
Just seen a preview of the documentary, now available on DVD with much extra material, called “The Corporation”.
Cutting in its analysis as widespread in the representatives interviewed, the documentary traces the history of the corporation, illustrating the dire consequences of a corporation being given the same legal status as a living being.
along the way it compares the behaviour of corporations to those of a clinical psychopath, and shows how corruption, use of war, distorting truth, ecological devastation and more result from the profligate spread of this 20th century invention.
The general conclusion about acting sustainably and CSR is that corporations will pursue it only when required for them to make a profit, and then to the bare minimum.
Under a false assumption that liberty and freedom will be restricted, people oppose all restrictions on the pathological beast, and refrain from demanding their governments put limitations on corporate power. On the contrary, the film shows how governments are prepared to privatise public utilities that willingly bankrupt citizens.
We encourage all to get to a showing or buy the DVD.
A MORE COUNTER-SUSTAINABLE INVENTION THAN THE CORPORATION IS HARD TO FIND!!!
One not -yet– published imagestream of mine came into contact with a flying machine reminiscent of a flying saucer. (The ones I met flew just above the earth’s surface.) On researching into the subject a little I found the great inventor Nikola Tesla had been working on a ”flying machine” just before his death. His angle on airplanes was that they were”fatally defective”. When questioned about his own device Dr. Tesla smiled an inscrutable smile. “All I have to say on that point is that my airship will have neither gas bag, wings nor propellers,” he said. “It is the child of my dreams, the product of years of intense and painful toil and research. I am not going to talk about it any further.”
The whole thing got me thinking about what flying saucers can teach us about sustainable transport.
They require the minimum of infrastructure. No roads or runways or tracks needed.This gives a much more effective use of land you can grow crops and use it as a means of travel at the same time. Much less material and land tied up.
No airports needed – and therefore none of the hassle associated with air travel of today.
Because of their stability the inherent safety reduces loss of life and environmental impacts resulting from crashes
Effectively powered, they produce no or little pollution.
The one I rode in had a fixed cruise speed. This also provided a safety feature vis – a vi other saucers as computers could control safety distances by predicting possible conflicts.
It also could turn on a sixpence – making it very flexible compared to the railway or a roadway.
The upper deck had the seats arranged in a circle – making the trip more of a social event, but it also had an on-line library so you could get educated while you fly.
Read the admiral attempts to explore these and other possibilities on the American Anti Gravity association’s homepage. (link above and below)
Acting in gratitude, appreciation and using all our gifts - intelligence, innovation, hope and determination - I believe we can create settlements for ourselves that are truly very beautiful places - reflecting the Very Beautiful Place inside.